home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- .rm70
- Emergency Communication: Is it legal?
-
- by Edward Mitchell, WA6AOD
-
- Reprinted from QST October 1988
-
- Copyright 1988 American Radio Relay League, Inc.
- All rights reserved.
-
- Thank you for requesting the following information from the ARRL
- Information mail server. ARRL HQ is glad to provide this information
- free of charge as a service to League members and affiliated clubs.
-
- For your convenience, you may reproduce this information, electronically
- or on paper, and distribute it to anyone who needs it, provided that
- you reproduce it in its entirety and do so free of charge. Please note
- that you must reproduce the information as it appears in the original,
- including the League's copyright notice.
-
- If you have any questions concerning the reproduction or distribution
- of this material, please contact Mark Wilson, American Radio Relay
- League, 225 Main St., Newington, CT 06111 (mwilson@arrl.org).
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Emergency Communication: Is it legal?
-
- Of course, all emergency communications are legal. Yet, due to
- folklore and second hand anecdotes, emergency and public service
- communications have become a confusing topic for many amateurs. A
- surprising number believe that much of our public service and disaster
- communications are illegal.
-
- Some examples:
-
- During August and September 1987, nearly 700 square miles of
- California forest lands were destroyed by wildfire, causing the
- evacuation of tens of thousands of mountain residents. Hundreds of
- ham operators provided support communications for the U. S. Forest
- Service, the California Department of Forestry, the American Red
- Cross, and other relief agencies.
-
- Once the fires were out, several hams were heard asking "Were we
- legal? Or, were we conducting the regular business of these relief
- agencies?".
-
- That this question was asked at all, under the circumstances,
- illustrates the confusing interpretations of FCC rules within the
- amateur fraternity.
-
- In some instances, the misunderstandings about emergency
- communications have irreparably tarnished the image of Amateur Radio.
- At a recent 200 mile bike ride, a "sag wagon" with Amateur Radio
- communications arrived on the scene of a serious accident; a volunteer
- paramedic had already arrived to administer first aid.
-
- Due to the extent of injuries, the paramedic asked to confer with
- a physician who happened to be in the vicinity of net control.
- Strangely, the net control refused to allow the physician to speak
- directly over the radio. In spite of complicated medical terminology
- and the potential for mistakes, the net control operator insisted on
- verbally relaying each message. The control operator said he wasn't
- sure if it would be legal for the paramedic to speak directly with the
- physician.
-
- Unfortunately this paramedic is a volunteer with a search and
- rescue group that needs Amateur Radio support. But, based on this
- tragic episode, they have chosen to avoid ham radio, because, the
- paramedic said, "It's unreliable."
-
- At still another bike tour, open to the public and sponsored by a
- local bike club, several hams told the ham radio coordinator that
- helping the bike club was not legal for ham radio - yet nine of the
- 2,500 riders suffered major injuries requiring paramedic or helicopter
- air ambulance response. Ham radio proved essential to the safety of
- the riders.
-
- So What Is Legal, Anyway?
-
- For the most part, the confusion is not really in the FCC
- regulations, but in the amateur community, and their understanding and
- interpretation of the FCC regulations.
-
- Somewhere in the chain of ham radio folklore, truths and half-
- truths about emergency communications have become distorted or
- altered. At times, hams have written to the FCC asking about a
- hypothetical situation. Unfortunately, this may result in a hasty
- legal opinion, formed without consideration of all necessary factual
- details, when fact, the FCC would prefer for us to be self-regulating
- and to resolve operational issues by ourselves [See reference 8].
-
- When the FCC releases a Report and Order, in a rulemaking
- proceeding, it usually includes a discussion explaining why the new
- rule was written. Sometimes, these explanations appear at odds with,
- or incompletely explain the regulations.
-
- To help us understand what we can and cannot do, we must have a
- good understanding of each of the following three principles:
-
- 1. Business communications,
- 2. Emergency communications,
- 3. Public service communications.
-
- Business communication are expressly forbidden within the Amateur
- Radio Service. The Amateur Radio Service exists for several good
- reasons, including public service and technical experimentation. If
- routine business communication were allowed, any business could
- license its employees and swamp our 2 meter band with kilowatt
- repeaters and continuous communications in which we would not be
- welcome. (This has already happened in the General Mobile Radio
- Service, a "mixed use" service for both personal and business use.)
-
- Because of this prohibition on business communications, the FCC
- has added a carefully worded exception for use during times of
- emergency, allowing Amateur Radio operators to conduct whatever type
- of communication is needed.
-
- Public service communication is provided for the benefit of the
- general public, such as when we help at running races or air shows.
-
- Business communications
-
- The FCC regulations, Section 97.3 define business communications as:
- 97.3 Definitions:
- (bb) Business communications. Any transmission
- or communication the purpose of which is to
- facilitate the regular business or
- commercial affairs of any party.
-
- The FCC rules, Sections 97.110 and 97.114 prohibit the use of
- Amateur Radio frequencies for business communications.
-
- Note that business is defined as the regular business or
- commercial affairs of any party. The FCC regulations make no
- distinction between for profit and not-for-profit businesses. You
- cannot conduct the regular business of a charitable organization, such
- as providing mobile communications for a food bank in its daily
- collection of surplus food.
-
- You can, however, assist at a 10k running race sponsored by the
- food bank (or a for profit business) when your involvement is for the
- primary benefit of the general public, even if there is an incidental
- benefit to the sponsor [see reference 3]. For example, where the
- communications are related to the safety of attendees and
- participants, the primary beneficiary is the general public, not the
- sponsor of the event.
-
- Emergency communications
-
- Normally, all types of business communications, and certain types
- of third party traffic are prohibited. However, an important exception
- is made during emergencies. Section 97.3 (w) defines emergencies as:
-
- 97.3 Definitions:
- (w) Emergency communication. Any Amateur Radio
- communication directly relating to the
- immediate safety of life of individuals or
- the immediate protection of property.
-
- The difficulty, as we will see in a moment, is the interpretation
- of what constitutes an immediate threat to life or property.
-
- Both Sections 97.110 and 97.114 allow business communications
- during emergencies.
-
- 97.110 Business communications prohibited.
- The transmission of business communications by
- an Amateur Radio station is prohibited except
- for emergency communications.
-
- 97.114 Limitations on third-party traffic.
- (b) The transmission or delivery of the following
- third-party traffic is prohibited:
- (3) Except for emergency communications as
- defined in this part, third-party traffic
- consisting of business communications on
- behalf of any party.
-
- During an emergency, you may use your radio in any manner that is
- appropriate. Even though putting out fires or providing disaster
- assistance may be the regular business of your fire department or of
- the American Red Cross, in these situations, an emergency affecting
- the immediate safety of life and property has occurred, and your
- Amateur Radio participation is not only allowed, but encouraged.
-
- When does a situation become an emergency?
-
- The key words that define an emergency are "immediate safety of
- life of individuals or the immediate protection of property." Obvious
- examples of an emergency include natural disasters - such as
- tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, floods - and other forms of severe
- weather, forest fires, land slides, and earthquakes, all of which
- typically cause immediate danger to both life and property.
-
- Under these guidelines, assisting the Forest Service during a
- wild fire, or allowing a physician to use your radio, or performing
- Red Cross disaster assessment are all legitimate Amateur Radio
- operations.
-
- Other situations, though, are less clear cut. For example, you
- spot a motorist, stranded along a suburban highway. Can you call for
- help on the repeater autopatch? At first this hardly seems like an
- emergency, but it may be a real danger to the stranded motorist.
-
- Last year, a San Francisco Bay Area mother and daughter were
- killed when their disabled automobile was struck from behind. They
- were parked well off on the right side of the freeway, emergency
- flashers on, hood up, in broad daylight. To a passing mobile ham,
- this hardly seemed like an emergency, but obviously, disabled vehicles
- along high speed freeways are a real danger to life and property.
-
- Could you have called for a tow truck?
-
- According to the ARRL's FCC Rule Book, the answer is yes.
- Calling a towing service eliminates the need for an officer to drive
- to the scene and gets the vehicle removed from a dangerous situation
- much sooner. Of course, on many roads, stopping is not considered
- safe, and you would be better off driving past and autopatching the
- local police authority.
-
- At the scene of an accident, can you hand your radio to an
- unlicensed person, such as a Fire Chief?
-
- Yes, as long as you remain the control operator, this is merely
- standard third-party operation. This is usually the most efficient
- way to provide communications to an agency during an emergency.
- Rather than relay the message yourself, why not put the sender and the
- recipient on the radio? This eliminates errors and is much more
- efficient.
-
- Public Service Communications
-
- The FCC encourages public service activities within the Amateur
- Service. The very first rule in the FCC regulations states:
-
- 97.1 Basis and purpose
- The rules and regulations in this part are
- designed to provide an Amateur Radio service
- having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the
- following principles:
- (a) Recognition and enhancement of the value
- of the amateur service to the public as a
- voluntary noncommercial communications
- service, particularly with respect to
- providing emergency communications.
-
- Much of the confusion over ham radio public service
- communications stems both from a confusing Report and Order issued by
- the FCC in 1983 [see reference 10] and from a letter written to the
- FCC in 1984, in regards to support of the New York City Marathon.
- [See references 3, 6, 9 and 10].
-
- One of the purposes of the amateur network had been to inform the
- general public, and possibly the news media, of the race status via a
- public address system at each mile marker. Clearly, this amounted to
- using Amateur Radio for purposes that are prohibited by the rules.
-
- The letter basically asked if it was okay for the ham network to
- be broadcast over a public address system. Quite correctly, the FCC
- replied that reporting the position of lead runners via the amateur
- network and the public address system ran afoul of the prohibition on
- broadcasting to the general public.
-
- But contrary to widespread misbelief, the FCC did not prohibit
- amateurs from participating at running races nor did the FCC prohibit
- hams from assisting at events where there are paid participants.
- Acceptable activities, the FCC wrote, are not determined "by the
- profit objectives of the sponsor, nor by the pay status of other
- participants .... Although some communications transmitted could
- incidentally benefit a sponsor, we do not view such communications as
- violations of the rules where their main purpose is to provide a
- service to the public."
-
- Further, and again contrary to popular opinion, the FCC did not
- rule that, in general, it is illegal to transmit lead runner position
- reports. At many races, the race director needs to know the locations
- of the lead runners, the "pack", and the last runners, so that he can
- correctly position the first aid, ambulance and water support crews.
- If that is indeed the purpose of lead runner reports, then this
- function is in the interest of runner and spectator safety and is a
- legal function for the Amateur Radio Service. Where position reports
- are intended for a P.A. broadcast, an alternate radio service must be
- used [See Alternatives to the Amateur Radio Service, in this article].
-
- Other examples of public service include bike races and tours,
- parades, air shows, a tornado or 4th of July fire watch, festivals,
- games and other activities that are open to the public or use your
- services to benefit the public.
-
- However, not all public service activities are allowed. For
- example, using ham radio to coordinate ticket sales at a public
- festival is forbidden since this is clearly a business function (See
- Alternatives to Ham Radio). On the other hand, using ham radio to
- coordinate supplies for an open-to-the-public, 100 mile bike tour,
- because such supplies, even if they include food, is essential to the
- well-being, health, and safety of the riders. Can you use tactical
- callsigns?
-
- Tactical callsigns are often used when working with other
- agencies during an emergency, or during large public service
- activities. For example, during a running race, names like "Finish
- line", "Mile 1", "Mile 2", "First Aid 1", "Water truck" quickly
- identify each function and eliminate confusion when working with other
- agencies, such as a fire department, where amateur callsigns are
- meaningless.
-
- The FCC does not prohibit tactical call signs, as long as the
- standard station identification rules are met (Section 97.84).
- Standard procedure is to identify at the end of each communication
- [the FCC's terminology] and at least every ten minutes during a
- communication.
-
- Can you receive payment for your Amateur Radio assistance?
-
- No, the FCC regulations prohibit payments for the use of an
- Amateur Radio station. Specifically,
-
- 97.112 No renumeration for use of station.
- (a) An amateur station shall not be used to
- transmit or receive messages for hire, nor
- for communication for material compensation,
- direct or indirect, paid or promised.
-
- Note that this rule does not prohibit you from being reimbursed
- for incidental expenses unrelated to your radio communication. If you
- assist at a disaster scene 100 miles from your home, you are not
- prohibited from receiving reimbursement for out of pocket travel
- expenses unrelated to your radio communication. For example, if as an
- American Red Cross Disaster Services Volunteer, you are flown to the
- scene of a disaster where you happen to use Amateur Radio as part of
- the relief effort, you are not required to pay your own air fare.
-
- In summary, the FCC encourages activities that benefit the
- public. In the FCC letter regarding the NYC Marathon, FCC Private
- Radio Bureau Chief Robert Foosaner wrote, "Please inform your group
- that their licenses are not endangered by participating in the
- marathon. They have my support and my personal thanks for serving the
- public."
-
- Public service activities are an important, if not the primary
- method, of training for participation in actual disasters and
- emergencies. When the public needs your help, often in a life or
- death emergency, they need trained assistance. You would not want
- untrained paramedics at an injury accident - nor do you want
- inexperienced hams handling communications at a quake damaged
- hospital.
-
- Press use of Amateur Radio
-
- Both business use and broadcasting, which the FCC defines as "the
- dissemination of radio communications intended to be received by the
- public directly ...." are prohibited within the Amateur Radio Service.
-
- In general, the media may not directly use Amateur Radio to
- collect information for their broadcasts. However, there are two
- important exceptions.
-
- First, anyone may listen to ham radio conversations. In the
- FCC's Report and Order 79-47, they wrote that it is okay for
- broadcasters to retransmit Amateur Radio transmissions. The
- broadcaster does not need permission of the FCC nor of the stations
- involved. This means that broadcasters were legal in retransmitting
- live descriptions of earthquake destruction emanating from Mexico
- City.
-
- Second, the FCC discussion in 79-47 wrote of a "rule of reason"
- that applies in interpreting the prohibition on broadcasting and news
- gathering.
-
- We note that a rule of reason applies when
- interpreting this emergency exception to the
- broadcast prohibitions in the Amateur Radio
- Service. Thus, conveying news information directly
- relating to an unforeseen event which involves the
- safety of human life or the immediate protection of
- property falls within this rule of reason, if it
- cannot be transmitted by any means other than
- Amateur Radio because of the remote location of the
- originating transmission or because normal
- communications have been disrupted by earthquake,
- fire, flood, tornado, hurricane, severe storm or
- national emergency ...
-
- In spite of this opinion, the regulations explicitly prohibit
- broadcast use and news gathering on the ham bands. The above quotation
- recognizes, however, that there may be extremely rare instances that
- warrant news gathering using Amateur Radio stations.
-
- Nevertheless, what you heard during certain recent disasters may
- not have been legal, even under this opinion. Clearly, the
- communications should relate to the actual disaster, and not the
- coordination of media activities, such as scheduling reporters or
- ordering equipment or food for a TV crew. And remember, this rule of
- reason applies in extremely rare cases only.
-
- Alternatives to the Amateur Radio Service
-
- Running races and fire departments do not have "ham radio
- problems" - they have communications problems. To them, ham radio is
- just a telephone. They are asking for your help because they need
- your expert assistance to solve a communications problem; that you use
- ham radio frequencies to meet their need is only incidental to them.
- At times, particularly when business-like functions are requested,
- alternatives to the Amateur Radio Service may be more appropriate.
-
- When a group asks for a function that we can not legally perform
- under current FCC regulations, we typically say we can not help them.
- We then miss out on an important training opportunity and we diminish
- our public service role in the eyes of our local community.
-
- But if we view ourselves as reliable communications problem
- solvers, we must do better. There is nothing in the rules prohibiting
- us, if properly licensed, from using another radio service for the
- communications that we are not authorized to perform. Operational
- techniques on frequency bands allocated to other services can be just
- as professional and valuable as on the ham bands.
-
- At some events you need to keep in touch with a key group of
- organizers, such as event directors, head of first aid, and so on.
- One approach has been to have a ham tail them continuously and to
- provide a radio when needed. Obviously, this is people intensive and a
- more convenient solution would be to hand the key person a simple,
- non-ham radio, hand held or beeper.
-
- Another example is that of the festival which needs to coordinate
- ticket sales. For these events, an alternative is to use business
- radio service transceivers.
-
- Besides, the Citizen's Band, there are three other services that
- could help. Low cost, short range, 49 MHz FM handheld radios are
- available from several suppliers. These radios cover 1/4 to 1/2 mile
- with a clean FM signal and are useful for short range communications.
-
- The General Mobile Radio Service operates on 16 FM channels at
- 462 MHz and 467 MHz. This service provides for both personal and
- business communication using relatively low cost radios.
-
- Portable and mobile cellular radiotelephone equipment should not
- be overlooked; anyone who can operate a telephone can use a cellular
- radiophone. Disadvantages are that cellular systems seldom work
- outside metropolitan areas or in mountainous terrain, and they are
- expensive.
-
- These alternate radio systems and other business systems should
- be suggested to those who ask for functions inappropriate for the
- Amateur Radio Service. In some instances, these radios can be
- purchased at low cost, provided by the sponsor of the event, or they
- are available for rent or loan from various sources (See the telephone
- book Yellow Pages).
-
- Summary
-
- Amateur Radio serves an important role in emergency and public
- service communications. Contrary to common misconception, the FCC
- regulations encourage public service and emergency communications by
- the Amateur Radio Service.
-
- In some situations, misunderstandings about emergency
- communications have reduced our effectiveness. To do our best, we
- must be familiar with the regulations and be ready to provide
- assistance when called upon.
-
- We, as Amateur Radio operators, must continue to provide our
- important public service or risk losing important public recognition,
- and hence, frequency spectrum, and even new hams. At a recent
- licensing class, more than two-thirds of the students said their
- primary reason for becoming a ham was because they wanted to help
- their communities through public service and disaster assistance. Our
- public service also serves as a deterrent to local city councils who
- wish to establish restrictive antenna ordinances.
-
- With the increasing use of cellular radio telephones, commercial
- packet systems, wide spread availability of radios for rent, and
- increased use of 800 MHz private, trunked radio systems by public
- service agencies, we must be innovative in applying Amateur Radio, and
- where legally necessary, non-Amateur Radio to communications problems;
- we, as licensed Amateur Radio operators are expert communications
- system designers.
-
- The days are long past when a hand held radio, or even a phone
- patch, could impress your local police and fire officials into
- incorporating ham radio in their disaster planning. Today, these
- planning officials have their own phone patches, their own cellular
- radiotelephones, and are building packet systems on their public
- safety frequencies.
-
- To meet today's challenges, we must work together as a skilled
- team, to provide creative communications solutions, inventing both new
- technologies and finding innovative uses for traditional systems, like
- HF SSB, VHF FM, and ATV.
-
- Acknowledgements
-
- I wish to thank the following individuals for their review of
- this article:
-
- From the Santa Clara Valley Section: Dave Larton, N6JQJ, Section
- Training Coordinator and Asst. Section Manager, Sharon Moerner, N6MWD,
- District Emergency Coordinator, Weo Moerner, WN6I, Jim Lomasney,
- WA6NIL, Palo Alto Emergency Coordinator, Patty Winter, N6BIS, and Ted
- Harris, N6IIU, Director of Disaster Services, Palo Alto Area Chapter
- of the American Red Cross.
-
- I'd also very much like to express appreciation to Craig Smith,
- N6ITW, District Emergency Coordinator for San Mateo County.
-
- Sidebar Text Box
-
- "But is this legal?"
-
- If you are in doubt as to the legality of a particular Amateur
- Radio operation, the ARRL recommends contacting your local Section
- Manager or other ARRL official. He or she can provide an answer or
- pass the question to the appropriate Amateur Radio advisor.
- Contacting the FCC for an opinion is generally not recommended.
-
- The FCC prefers for the Amateur Radio Service to be self-
- policing. Writing to the FCC asking for a legal opinion is generally
- the wrong way to approach your question and has, at times, resulted in
- opinions developed without a full presentation of the facts.
-
- In one instance, a hypothetical question involving phone patches
- was posed to two separate FCC offices: Not surprisingly, the ham
- received two contradictory opinions. Depending upon who you asked, you
- could have created a new policy to which not even the FCC would agree
- to!
-
- References ----------
-
- 1. "Happenings", QST, December 1985, pg 67
- 2. "Washington Mailbox", QST, September 1985, pg 73
- 3. The FCC Rule Book, ARRL, March 1987
- 4. "Scanning Today", ed. by Robert Hanson, Popular Communications,
- November 1987, pg 8
- 5. "Operation Vatican via ATV", Ted Harris, N6IIU, Worldradio,
- December 1987, pg 22
- 6. "Washington Mailbox: The Dos and Don'ts for Business
- Communications and Third-Party Messages", QST, March, 1985, pg 64
- 7. The ARRL Operating Manual, editor Robert J. Halprin, Chapter 14,
- "Emergency Communications", by Richard Regent, K9GDF, ARRL, 1987
- 8. "League Lines", QST, May 1987, page 13 9. Personal correspondence
- with one of the ham particpants.
- 10. "Washington Mailbox: Ajax Halibut Company 'Run for the Halibut'
- Marathon", QST, September 1983, pg 65
-